Tony Gatto is accused of using dummy directors to control construction firms and systematically evade taxes over several decades [1, 2].

The allegations suggest a coordinated effort to infiltrate the Big Build program in Victoria. If proven, the scale of the corporate manipulation indicates a significant breach of government procurement and tax compliance protocols within the state's infrastructure sector.

According to reports, Gatto sat atop a corporate morass, utilizing a network of proxy directors to maintain hidden control over various companies [1, 2]. This structure allegedly allowed him to dodge tax obligations while securing positions within the state's massive construction projects [1, 2].

The scheme focused on the Big Build program, a series of large-scale infrastructure projects across Victoria [1, 2]. By installing dummy directors, Gatto could reportedly operate firms without appearing as the legal owner, shielding his identity from regulators and tax authorities [1, 2].

These practices have reportedly continued for decades, creating a complex web of corporate entities designed to bypass legal scrutiny [1, 2]. The use of such proxies is a tactic often used to hide the true beneficial ownership of a business, a move that complicates law enforcement efforts to track financial irregularities.

The revelations have brought renewed scrutiny to how the Victorian government vets contractors for its public works projects [1, 2]. The ability of a single individual to control multiple firms via proxies suggests a vulnerability in the oversight of the Big Build program's supply chain [1, 2].

Tony Gatto is accused of using dummy directors to control construction firms and systematically evade taxes.

This case highlights a systemic risk in public infrastructure procurement where beneficial ownership is not strictly verified. The use of dummy directors allows individuals to circumvent tax laws and government blacklists, potentially allowing bad actors to profit from taxpayer-funded projects while avoiding the legal responsibilities of corporate ownership.